Abstract

 
 

References (30)



 


 



Why Delegate?: An Incomplete Contracting Approach to Environmental Federalism


C.-Y. Cynthia Lin


University of California at Davis

June 29, 2004


Abstract:     
This paper examines the optimality of environmental regulatory delegation when neither output levels nor effort levels are contractible. The key trade-off is that while the federal government is able to internalize externalities, the state governments have preferences that are better aligned with local welfare. I compare four decentralization scenarios, each corresponding to a different allocation of output power and effort power between the federal and state governments. A central finding is that conjoint federalism (the federal government chooses output while the states choose effort), which is the regulatory structure used for many environmental regulations in the United States, tends to be the least efficient form, while a reverse form of delegation tends to be the most efficient.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: Environmental federalism, incomplete contracts, delegation, regulation, federalism

JEL Classification: H77, H10, Q58, H51, D62, L51, D70, D20

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, Why Delegate?: An Incomplete Contracting Approach to Environmental Federalism (June 29, 2004). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=587402 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.587402

Contact Information

C.-Y. Cynthia Lin (Contact Author)
University of California at Davis ( email )
Davis, CA 95616
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,581
Downloads: 206
Download Rank: 72,701
References:  30

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds