Footnotes (109)



Pluralizing International Criminal Justice (Review Essay)

Mark A. Drumbl

Washington and Lee University - School of Law

Michigan Law Review, 2005

This Review Essay of Philippe Sands' (ed.) From Nuremberg to the Hague (2003) explores a number of controversial aspects of the theory and praxis of international criminal law. The Review Essay traces the extant heuristic of international criminal justice institutions to Nuremberg and posits that the Nuremberg experience suggests the need for modesty about what criminal justice actually can accomplish in the wake of mass atrocity. It also explores the place of one person's guilt among organic crime, the reality that international criminal law may gloss over criminogenic conditions in its pursuit of individualized accountability, the possibility of group sanction for collective violence, and the complex relationship between international interventions and national legal institutions. In the end, this manuscript underscores the relevance of law to stigmatizing enemies of humankind while underscoring that the best way to bolster this relevance is through a sincere, and sustained, process of critique and reflection.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 7, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Drumbl, Mark A., Pluralizing International Criminal Justice (Review Essay). Michigan Law Review, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=587430

Contact Information

Mark A. Drumbl (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Sydney Lewis Hall
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
540-458-8531 (Phone)
540-458-8488 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/profiledetail.asp?id=11
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,007
Downloads: 360
Download Rank: 54,345
Footnotes:  109

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds