Abstract

 
 

References (19)



 
 

Citations (13)



 


 



Welfare vs. Market Access: The Implications of Tariff Structure for Tariff Reform


James E. Anderson


Boston College - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

J. Peter Neary


University of Oxford - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

September 2004

NBER Working Paper No. W10730

Abstract:     
We show that the effects of tariff changes on welfare and import volume can be fully characterized by their effects on the generalized mean and variance of the tariff distribution. Using these tools, we derive new results for welfare- and market-access-improving tariff changes, which imply two 'cones of liberalization' in price space. Because welfare is negatively but import volume positively related to the generalized variance, the cones do not intersect, which poses a dilemma for trade policy reform. Finally, we show that generalized and trade-weighted moments are mutually proportional when the trade expenditure function is CES.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

JEL Classification: F13

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Anderson, James E. and Neary, J. Peter, Welfare vs. Market Access: The Implications of Tariff Structure for Tariff Reform (September 2004). NBER Working Paper No. W10730. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=587944

Contact Information

James E. Anderson (Contact Author)
Boston College - Department of Economics ( email )
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States
617-552-3691 (Phone)
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
J. Peter Neary
University of Oxford - Department of Economics ( email )
Manor Road Building
Manor Road
Oxford, OX1 3BJ
United Kingdom
Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
77 Bastwick Street
London, EC1V 3PZ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 314
Downloads: 22
References:  19
Citations:  13

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.640 seconds