Abstract

 


 



A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Views from the United States and Japan


Kevin M. Clermont


Cornell Law School


Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 1, 2004
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-027

Abstract:     
Japanese and U.S. legal systems, despite surprisingly similar doctrine and outlook on matters of jurisdiction and judgments, often clash: jurisdictions overlap and judgments may go unrespected, while parallel proceedings persist. The current outlook for harmonization through a multilateral Hague convention of general scope is bleak. These two countries are, however, ideally situated to reach a highly feasible bilateral agreement that would provide a better tomorrow in which jurisdiction was allocated appropriately and judgments were respected accordingly.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Clermont, Kevin M., A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Views from the United States and Japan. Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 1, 2004; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-027. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=588221

Contact Information

Kevin M. Clermont (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-5189 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,239
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 92,760

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds