Footnotes (182)



Monstrous Impersonation: A Critique of Consent-Based Justifications for Hard Paternalism

Thaddeus Mason Pope

Mitchell Hamline School of Law; Australian Health Law Research Center, QUT; Saint Georges University; Alden March Bioethics Institute

University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 681-713, 2005

Restricting a person's substantially voluntary, self-regarding conduct primarily for the sake of that person is hard paternalism. Particularly in the public health context, scholars, legislators, and judges are devoting increasing attention to discussing the conditions and circumstances under which hard paternalism is justified. One popular type of argument for the justifiability of hard paternalism takes its normative warrant from the consent of the restricted person.

In this Article, I argue that scholars and policymakers should abandon consent-based arguments for the justifiability of hard paternalism. Such arguments are torn between incoherence and lacking moral force. Very few consent-based arguments successfully resolve this tension. But even these arguments appeal, at bottom, to a notion of beneficence for their justificatory force.

Policymakers should not make strained efforts to demonstrate that the subject of hard paternalism has "consented" to the limitation of liberty. They should, instead, calibrate the moral scales to ascertain the circumstances under which restricting liberty achieves benefits of sufficient weight to justify overriding individual liberty. A balancing framework reveals the tradeoffs at issue. And using such a framework will lead to clearer, more consistent, and more legitimate public policy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: paternalism, consent, autonomy

JEL Classification: K10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 13, 2004 ; Last revised: November 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Pope, Thaddeus Mason, Monstrous Impersonation: A Critique of Consent-Based Justifications for Hard Paternalism. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 681-713, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=588341

Contact Information

Thaddeus Mason Pope (Contact Author)
Mitchell Hamline School of Law ( email )
875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-695-7661 (Phone)
901-202-7549 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Australian Health Law Research Center, QUT ( email )
2 George Street
Brisbane, Queensland 4000
Saint Georges University ( email )
West Indies
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Alden March Bioethics Institute ( email )
47 New Scotland Ave
MC 153
Albany, NY 12208
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,386
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 213,149
Footnotes:  182

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds