Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=588521
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (44)



 


 



Technology, Privacy, and the Courts: A Reply to Colb and Swire


Orin S. Kerr


George Washington University - Law School


Michigan Law Review, Vol. 102, pp. 934-943, March 2004

Abstract:     
This is a brief reply to published comments by Professor Sherry Colb and Professor Peter Swire on an article by Professor Orin Kerr entitled, "The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution," forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review. This reply will be published along with the lead article and the comments by Swire and Colb.

The reply contains a response to Professor Colb followed by a response to Professor Swire. Topics covered include the relative competence of Congress and the Courts in the protection of privacy involving new technologies; the constitutional authority of Congress to protect privacy in new technologies; and the pragmatist case for reading privacy statutes broadly.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: "fourth amendment," privacy, computers

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Technology, Privacy, and the Courts: A Reply to Colb and Swire. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 102, pp. 934-943, March 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=588521

Contact Information

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.asp?ID=3568
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,956
Downloads: 287
Download Rank: 62,271
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  44

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds