Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=590983
 
 

References (33)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Assessing Competency Competently: Toward a Rational Standard for Competency-to-Stand-Trial Assessments


Grant H. Morris


University of San Diego, School of Law - Professor of Law Emeritus

Ansar M. Haroun


University of California, San Diego

David Naimark


University of California, San Diego


Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2004

Abstract:     
This article reports on a survey of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists who read two case study vignettes and assessed whether each criminal defendant was competent to stand trial using three differently worded standards of competency - one that focuses on whether the defendant's thinking is rational, a second that focuses on whether the defendant's behavior is rational, and a third that does not use the word "rational." The objective was to discover whether forensic examiners would distinguish between the standards (i.e., find the defendant competent under one standard but not under another) or whether they would find the defendant competent under all standards or incompetent under all standards. In responding to both vignettes, more than three-fourths of all respondents either found the defendant competent under all three standards or incompetent under all three standards. Additionally, in answering one vignette, the respondents divided almost equally in deciding whether the defendant was competent to stand trial. These results are analyzed and respondents' comments are discussed. The article concludes with specific proposals to improve competency to stand trial assessments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: law and medicine, law and psychiatry, criminal law

JEL Classification: K00, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Morris, Grant H. and Haroun, Ansar M. and Naimark, David, Assessing Competency Competently: Toward a Rational Standard for Competency-to-Stand-Trial Assessments. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=590983

Contact Information

Grant Harold Morris (Contact Author)
University of San Diego, School of Law - Professor of Law Emeritus ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Ansar M. Haroun
University of California, San Diego ( email )
9500 Gilman Drive
Mail Code 0502
La Jolla, CA 92093-0502
United States
David Naimark
University of California, San Diego ( email )
9500 Gilman Drive
Mail Code 0502
La Jolla, CA 92093-0502
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,732
Downloads: 217
Download Rank: 80,690
References:  33
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.329 seconds