|
||||
|
||||
Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together: Experimental Evidence of Anticommons Tragedies
Ben Depoorter University of Miami - School of Law; Ghent University - Department of Legal Theory and Legal History Sven Vanneste Ghent University - Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology February 22, 2004 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-53 Abstract: This Article conducts an experimental investigation of anticommons dilemmas. The results confirm that anticommons deadweight losses increase with the degree of complementarity and the degree of fragmentation of property. Our study further provides three novel insights into the problem of fragmentation. First, the data illustrates that individual right holders ignore the expected value of bundling and instead focus on the maximum profit he or she could realize by bundling. Second, the experiments suggest that uncertainty amplifies the anticommons pricing effect. Finally, cooperation is higher in cases wherethe value of bundling is more uncertain as opposed to scenarios where there is relative certainty of creating surplus but there is a (modest) chance of losses from bundling.
Keywords: Anticommons, property regimes, law and economics JEL Classifications: K10, K11 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: September 20, 2004 ; Last revised: November 04, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollob 1 in 0.328 seconds.