A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights
Kim Lane Scheppele
Program in Law and Public Affairs, Princeton University; Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University; University Center for Human Values, Princeton University
Texas Law Review, 2004
Social rights are controversial in theory, but many constitutions feature long lists of social rights anyway. But how can poor states ever hope to realize these rights? This article examines the practical bargaining over social rights that occurs when countries go broke and international financial institutions step in to direct internal fiscal affairs. Constitutional Courts can give their own governments leverage in bargaining with the IMF by making strong decisions defending social rights just at those moments. Because of the IMF's commitment to the rule of law, it is hard for the IMF to insist as part of the conditionality of its loans that governments overtly disobey rulings of their countries' high courts. Looking at Hungary (where the Constitutional Court made such a decision and the government used it to negotiate better terms with the IMF) and Russia (where the Constitutional Court made such a decision and the Russian government ignored it), the article addresses when this tactic might work and how strong court decisions can help governments protect their own populations in times of economic disaster.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: International Monetary Fund, Hungary, Social RightsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 22, 2004
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.297 seconds