Footnotes (168)



The Republican Model and Punitive Damages

David F. Partlett

Emory University School of Law

San Diego Law Review, November/December 2004

Fueled by complaints of outlandish punitive damage awards and a United States Supreme Court intent on bringing constitutional order to this corner of torts damages, a considerable literation has emerged. Commentators have examined the bases for the award of punitive damages and have applied empirical analysis to probe the legitimacy of popular criticism and the extent to which punitive damages fulfill the goals assigned to them. In this essay, I propose that punitive damages should be conceptualized in light of a republican theory of tort law with the jury as its central institution. This is ironic, since influential commentators and the courts have viewed the jury as a hindrance to a rational body of law. My recommendation is that the jury needs to be strengthened in providing it with the vitality to perform its republican role.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Partlett, David F., The Republican Model and Punitive Damages. San Diego Law Review, November/December 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=595461

Contact Information

David F. Partlett (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-8815 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,680
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 170,420
Footnotes:  168

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds