Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=595881
 
 

Citations



 


 



Initial Public Offerings in Hot and Cold Markets


Jean Helwege


University of South Carolina

Nellie Liang


Federal Reserve Board


Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 39, p. 541, September 2004

Abstract:     
The literature offers many explanations for why the IPO market cycles from hot to cold. These include theories in which hot markets represent clusters of IPOs in a new industry, and signaling models that predict that hot markets draw in better quality firms. Others suggest hot market IPOs' stock returns reflect their poor quality. We compare IPOs over cycles during 1975-2000 and find that hot and cold IPO markets do not differ so much in the characteristics of the firms that go public as in the quantity of firms that go public. Both hot and cold IPOs are largely concentrated in the same narrow set of industries and they have few distinctions in profits, age, or growth potential. Our results suggest that hot markets are not driven primarily by changes in adverse selection costs, managerial opportunism, or technological innovations, but more likely reflect greater investor optimism.

JEL Classification: G32

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: October 6, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Helwege, Jean and Liang, Nellie, Initial Public Offerings in Hot and Cold Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 39, p. 541, September 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=595881

Contact Information

Jean Helwege
University of South Carolina ( email )
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
Nellie Liang (Contact Author)
Federal Reserve Board ( email )
Capital Markets Section
20th & C. St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20551
United States
202-452-2918 (Phone)
202-452-3819 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,333

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.296 seconds