SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (377)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Treaties as Laws: A Defense of the Last in Time Rule for Treaties and Federal Statutes

Julian Ku
Hofstra University - School of Law



Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 319
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-12

Abstract:     
For nearly 150 years, courts have applied the last in time rule to resolve conflicts between treaties and federal statutes by giving effect to whichever was enacted later in time. Despite its acceptance by the courts, this rule has received unanimous criticism in the legal academy. In this article, I present the first comprehensive defense of the last in time rule on textual, structural, historical, and functional grounds. I argue that the last in time rule should be applied because the text of the Constitution grants treaties the status of enacted domestic law. As such, treaties are subject to the principle of statutory construction, leges posteriors priores contrarias abrogant (later laws abrogate prior laws that are contrary), unless otherwise indicated by the Constitution's text or structure. This understanding is supported by Supreme Court precedent, historical evidence from the Founding era, including practice during the pre-Constitution era, discussions during the Constitutional Convention and ratifying debates, as well as actions during the early years of the Constitutional era. In the course of defending the last in time rule, I also consider how the rule fits into the broader debate over the extent to which treaties, which increasingly seek to regulate traditionally domestic matters, have effect in the U.S. legal system. The last in time rule, I contend, provides an elegant compromise between internationalists seeking greater incorporation of treaties and revisionists seeking to limit or eliminate such incorporation. Under the last in time rule, treaties are given direct domestic effect, which facilitates greater U.S. participation in the international system. On the other hand, the last in time rule guarantees that a politically accountable Congress retains the flexibility to control a treaty's domestic effects.

Keywords: Treaties, international law, constitutional law, statutory interpretation

JEL Classifications: K3

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 04, 2004 ; Last revised: November 22, 2006

Suggested Citation

Ku, Julian G., Treaties as Laws: A Defense of the Last in Time Rule for Treaties and Federal Statutes. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 319; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=597961


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Julian G. Ku (Contact Author)
Hofstra University - School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-4237 (Phone)
516-463-6264 (Fax)

Hofstra University Logo

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,678
Downloads: 228
Download Rank: 37,178
Footnotes: 377

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.