Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=600261
 
 

Footnotes (314)



 


 



Lane, Fundamental Rights, & Voting


Michael Evan Waterstone


Loyola Law School Los Angeles; Northwestern University - School of Law


Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
New federalism's premise is that the Courts are the ultimate arbiter of Congress's ability to use its Section 5 powers to enforce Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. This Article argues that while this principle survives the Supreme Court's recent decision in Tennessee v. Lane, the rules have been changed for cases involving fundamental rights. In Lane, the Court's review of Congress' justifications and constitutional bases for passing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act was more relaxed than in previous new federalism cases. While Lane itself does not justify this departure, this Article suggests that the doctrinal and theoretical justification for this shift is that the Court should give a presumption in favor of the validity of Congressional abrogation of state sovereign immunity in cases involving fundamental rights.

This Article applies this view of Lane to a future category of ADA Title II fundamental rights litigation - cases involving the right to vote for people with disabilities. Although earlier new federalism cases would compel a different conclusion, after Lane, Courts should hold that the ADA validly abrogates the States' sovereign immunity in Title II voting cases. This has implications for the whole range of Section 5 legislation.

Finally, the disability rights community has criticized Lane for providing insufficient clarity for future Title II cases. This application of Lane to voting responds to that criticism, showing how the presumption in fundamental rights cases is sufficiently strong as to discourage needless litigation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: Federalism, disability, voting

JEL Classification: K19, K30, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 7, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Waterstone, Michael Evan, Lane, Fundamental Rights, & Voting. Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=600261

Contact Information

Michael Evan Waterstone (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-1855 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/MichaelWaterstone/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,755
Downloads: 137
Download Rank: 128,399
Footnotes:  314

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds