|
||||
|
||||
A Revealed Preference Ranking of U.S. Colleges and Universities
Christopher Avery Harvard University - John F. Kennedy School of Government; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Mark E. Glickman Boston University - Department of Health Services Caroline M. Hoxby Stanford University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Hoover Institution; Stanford University Andrew Metrick Yale School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) December 2005 NBER Working Paper No. W10803 Abstract: We show how to construct a ranking of U.S. undergraduate programs based on students' revealed preferences. We construct examples of national and regional rankings, using hand-collected data on 3,240 high-achieving students. Our statistical model extends models used for ranking players in tournaments, such as chess or tennis. When a student makes his matriculation decision among colleges that have admitted him, he chooses which college "wins" in head-to-head competition. The model exploits the information contained in thousands of these wins and losses. Our method produces a ranking that would be difficult for a college to manipulate. In contrast, it is easy to manipulate the matriculation rate and the admission rate, which are the common measures of preference that receive substantial weight in highly publicized college rating systems. If our ranking were used in place of these measures, the pressure on colleges to practice strategic admissions would be relieved. We show how to deal with tuition discounts, alumni preferences, early decision programs, specialty schools, and similar issues.
JEL Classifications: I2, C11, C25 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 11, 2004 ; Last revised: September 15, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.140 seconds.