Agree or Not Agree? The Role of Cognitive and Affective Processes in Group Disagreements
Matthew A. Cronin
George Mason University - School of Management
Santa Clara University - Psychology Department
Laurie R. Weingart
Carnegie Mellon University - David A. Tepper School of Business
Catherine H. Tinsley
Georgetown University - Department of Management
IACM 17th Annual Conference Paper
We develop and test a theoretical framework for understanding how cognitive and affective processes (cognitive and affective integration) influence the way in which disagreements (task and process) among group members affect their performance (individual and group level performance). We use this framework to explain how and why diversity may be either beneficial or detrimental to group process and outcomes. Specifically, we examine how group faultlines may hinder members' ability to create a shared understanding of the problem (cognitive integration) and a shared motivation to synthesize their knowledge (affective integration). If this happens, then groups will fail to share and process information, which will hinder group performance and satisfaction. We test this theory on 321 MBA students in 88 five to six person teams from a prestigious East Coast university.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: disagreements, diversity, group performance
JEL Classification: D74working papers series
Date posted: October 9, 2004
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.594 seconds