Global Governance: An Heretical History Play

Fleur E. Johns

University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law; Faculty of Law, University of NSW

Global Jurist Advances, Vol. 4, No. 2, Article 3, 2004

This article begins from an intuition that aspirations for governance on a global scale have been seeded among the historical habits of humanism, as well as among those economic and technological phenomena on which other scholars of globalization most frequently focus. It argues that Modern predilections for constitutionalizing, distinguishing, ranking, tempering and charting, and fearing that which resists such handling, are as significant to contemporary perceptions of globalization and its governance as any of the technological and economic developments said to underpin it. This argument is elaborated by interpolating some contemporary accounts of global governance with unlikely historical counterpoints drawn from the sixteenth century city-state of Venice: historical counterpoints that draw attention to the vital role of the foreign, the popular and the vulgar in building and defending centres of global governance. In so doing, this article aims to probe the ambiguous role that Modern political legacies play in contemporary scholarship. Transgressive potential is not, this article argues, exterior or opposed to monolithic accounts of global governance: it is there at their every inception.

Keywords: Globalization, global governance, history, law, Venice, foreigners, international law

JEL Classification: F01, F22, N43, K19, K33

Not Available For Download

Date posted: October 14, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Johns, Fleur E., Global Governance: An Heretical History Play. Global Jurist Advances, Vol. 4, No. 2, Article 3, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=603232

Contact Information

Fleur E. Johns (Contact Author)
University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law ( email )
Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Faculty of Law, University of NSW ( email )
Faculty of Law
University of NSW
Sydney, NSW 2052
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,014

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.594 seconds