|
||||
|
||||
The Profitability of Technical Analysis: A Review
Cheol-Ho Park Korea Capital Market Institute Scott H. Irwin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics October 2004 AgMAS Project Research Report No. 2004-04 Abstract: The purpose of this report is to review the evidence on the profitability of technical analysis. The empirical literature is categorized into two groups, "early" and "modern" studies, according to the characteristics of testing procedures. Early studies indicated that technical trading strategies were profitable in foreign exchange markets and futures markets, but not in stock markets before the 1980s. Modern studies indicated that technical trading strategies consistently generated economic profits in a variety of speculative markets at least until the early 1990s. Among a total of 92 modern studies, 58 studies found positive results regarding technical trading strategies, while 24 studies obtained negative results. Ten studies indicated mixed results. Despite the positive evidence on the profitability of technical trading strategies, it appears that most empirical studies are subject to various problems in their testing procedures, e.g., data snooping, ex post selection of trading rules or search technologies, and difficulties in estimation of risk and transaction costs. Future research must address these deficiencies in testing in order to provide conclusive evidence on the profitability of technical trading strategies.
Keywords: technical analysis, market efficiency, trading systems, speculative markets JEL Classifications: G13, G14, G15 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 15, 2004 ; Last revised: November 16, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.110 seconds.