|
||||
|
||||
Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form
Yingyi Qian University of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Eric Maskin Princeton University - Department of Economics; Harvard University - Department of Economics; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Chenggang Xu University of Hong Kong 1997 Al. 187 WP 331 Abstract: We model an organization as a hierarchy of managers erected on top of a technology (here consisting of a collection of plants). In our framework, the role of a manager is to take steps to reduce the adverse consequences of shocks that affect the plants beneath him. We argue that different organizational forms give rise to different information about managers'performance and therefore differ according to how effective incentives canbe in encouraging a good performance. In particular, we show that, undercertain assumptions, the M-form (multi-divisional form) is likely to provide better incentives than the U-form (unitary form) because it promotes yardstick competition (i.e. relative performance evaluation) more effectively. We conclude by presenting evidence that the assumptions on which this comparison rests are satisfied for Chinese data.
JEL Classifications: D2, D8, H1, L2, P5 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: February 19, 1998 ; Last revised: June 28, 2000Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 3 in 1.297 seconds.