Do Managers Listen to the Market?
James B. Kau
University of Georgia - Department of Insurance, Legal Studies, Real Estate
James S. Linck
Southern Methodist University
Paul H. Rubin
Emory University - Department of Economics
March 7, 2008
There are competing theories as to whether managers learn from stock prices. Dye and Sridhar (2002), for example, argue that capital markets can be better informed than the firm itself, while Roll (1986) argues managers may ignore market signals due to hubris. In this paper, we examine whether managers listen to the market in making major corporate investments, and whether agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms help explain managers' propensity to listen. We find that, on average, managers listen to the market: they are more likely to cancel investments when the market reacts unfavorably to the related announcement. Further, we find mixed evidence consistent with the notion that managers' propensity to listen is related to agency costs. We find that firms tend to listen to the market more when more of their shares are held by large blockholders, and when their CEOs have higher pay-performance sensitivities.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: Agency costs, information markets, investment decisions, merger, acquisition, learning
JEL Classification: G31, G34working papers series
Date posted: October 28, 2004 ; Last revised: March 12, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.094 seconds