Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=610586
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (68)



 


 



Theory and Practice of Competition Advocacy at the FTC


Todd J. Zywicki


George Mason University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center

James C. Cooper


George Mason University School of Law - Law & Economics Center

Paul A. Pautler


U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics


Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 1091-1112, 2005
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-48

Abstract:     
This article was prepared as part of a recent symposium celebrating the Ninetieth Anniversary of the founding of the Federal Trade Commission. In addition, Fall 2004 marks the Thirtieth Anniversary of a pivotal moment in the establishment of the modern advocacy program at the FTC, Chairman Lewis Engman's speech on the economic burden that inefficient transportation regulation policies were imposing on the American economy. Although the FTC has been involved in advocacy activities since its founding, Engman's speech symbolized a new aggressiveness on the part of the FTC in using its expertise to work with other governmental actors at all levels of the political system and in all branches of government to design policies that further competition and consumer choice.

Notwithstanding the beneficial impact that advocacy activities have had on the economy, the fortunes of the advocacy program have waxed and waned over time. In part, these mixed fortunes may reflect a lack of fundamental grounding of advocacy within the core mission of the FTC. The advocacy program, moreover, often has been politically controversial, exposing the Commission to criticism from special interests, Congress, and other governmental actors.

This article explores the theory and practice of competition advocacy, with the goal of explaining why the advocacy program should be recognized as a core element of the Commission's mission. Advocacy can be used in conjunction with many of the FTC's other tools, and in many situations the judicious use of advocacy can provide a low-cost and effective alternative to other enforcement options. The advocacy program is a unique and cost-effective tool for carrying out this mission. Because consumers are disadvantaged in the political arena vis-a-vis industry, they are likely to be unable to stop anticompetitive regulation on their own. Antitrust immunities, moreover, sometimes put anticompetitive regulation beyond the reach of traditional enforcement. By providing a means for the FTC to represent consumers' interests directly in the policy-production mechanism, the advocacy program can overcome these two hurdles and provide protection for consumers at relatively low cost.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Public Choice, Rent-Seeking, Antitrust Law & Policy

JEL Classification: K21, K23, H11, H70

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 26, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Zywicki, Todd J. and Cooper, James C. and Pautler, Paul A., Theory and Practice of Competition Advocacy at the FTC. Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 1091-1112, 2005; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-48. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=610586 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.610586

Contact Information

Todd J. Zywicki (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8091 (Phone)
703-993-8088 (Fax)

George Mason Law School Logo

PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

James C. Cooper
George Mason University School of Law - Law & Economics Center ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-9582 (Phone)

George Mason Law School Logo

Paul A. Pautler
U.S. Federal Trade Commission - Bureau of Economics ( email )
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,148
Downloads: 403
Download Rank: 39,802
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  68

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.360 seconds