Corporate Diversification in East Asia: The Role of Ultimate Ownership and Group Affiliation
Joseph P. H. Fan
Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - School of Accountancy
International Monetary Fund (IMF); University of Amsterdam - Finance Group; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); Tinbergen Institute; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Ministry of Finance; World Bank
Larry H.P. Lang
Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Department of Finance
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2089
Some East Asian firms diversify to circumvent external factor markets subject to high transaction costs. Other diversify as a means of expropriation by large stockholders. There is evidence that group affiliation is used to complement firm-level diversification in the creation of internal markets.
Using data for more than 2,000 companies from nine East Asian economies, Claessens, Djankov, Fan, and Lang examine the interactions between ultimate ownership, group affiliation, and corporate diversification.
They find evidence that allocating resources within business groups is associated with higher market valuation when external markets are less developed.
They also find that group affiliation and firm-level diversification are used complementarily to exploit the relative cost-effectiveness of internal markets.
They reject the hypothesis that diversification patterns can be explained by large blockholders' incentive to reduce risk. But they find support for the hypothesis that controlling owners use diversification to expropriate other shareholders.
Group affiliation is widespread among publicly traded corporations in East Asia. Group-affiliated firms are on average associated with diversification discounts. Further analysis reveals that the discounts are attributable to diversified firms in the more developed East Asian economies. By contrast, group affiliation positively contributes to diversification performance in less developed economies.
The authors find that group-affiliated firms are more likely to diversify in developing economies but are equally likely to diversify in developed economies.
When diversifying in more developed economies, group-affiliated firms destroy more value than do independent firms. In developing economies, group-affiliated firms are more likely than independent firms to benefit from diversification in developing economies.
This paper - a product of the Financial Economics Unit, Financial Operations Vice Presidency - is part of a larger effort in the vice presidency to study corporate performance patterns in East Asia.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32working papers series
Date posted: November 8, 2004
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.672 seconds