|
||||
|
||||
Does Soft Dollar Brokerage Benefit Portfolio Investors: Agency Problem or Solution?Stephen M. HoranCFA Institute D. Bruce JohnsenGeorge Mason University - School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center March 2004 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-50 Abstract: With soft dollar brokerage, institutional portfolio managers pay brokers "premium" commission rates in exchange for rebates they use to buy third-party research. One hypothesis views this practice as a reflection of the agency problem in delegated portfolio management; another views it as a contractual solution to the agency problem that aligns the incentives of investors, managers, and brokers where direct monitoring mechanisms are inadequate. Using a database of institutional money managers, we find that premium commission payments are positively related to risk-adjusted performance, suggesting that soft dollar brokerage is a solution to agency problems. Moreover, premium commissions are positively related to management fees, suggesting that labor market competition does not punish managers for using soft dollars.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: Portfolio choice, Investment Decisions JEL Classification: G11 working papers seriesDate posted: November 15, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.609 seconds