|
||||
|
||||
Does Soft Dollar Brokerage Benefit Portfolio Investors: Agency Problem or Solution?
Stephen M. Horan St. Bonaventure University - Department of Finance D. Bruce Johnsen George Mason University - School of Law March 2004 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-50 Abstract: With soft dollar brokerage, institutional portfolio managers pay brokers "premium" commission rates in exchange for rebates they use to buy third-party research. One hypothesis views this practice as a reflection of the agency problem in delegated portfolio management; another views it as a contractual solution to the agency problem that aligns the incentives of investors, managers, and brokers where direct monitoring mechanisms are inadequate. Using a database of institutional money managers, we find that premium commission payments are positively related to risk-adjusted performance, suggesting that soft dollar brokerage is a solution to agency problems. Moreover, premium commissions are positively related to management fees, suggesting that labor market competition does not punish managers for using soft dollars.
Keywords: Portfolio choice, Investment Decisions JEL Classifications: G11 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: November 15, 2004 ; Last revised: November 19, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.094 seconds.