SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (6)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Medical Malpractice and the Insurance Underwriting Cycle

Tom Baker
University of Pennsylvania Law School



Depaul Law Review, Vol. 54, May 2005

Abstract:     
Lost in the recent efforts to take political advantage of (or explain away) the rapid rise in liability insurance premiums is any real attempt to understand the underwriting cycle, why it is so severe in medical malpractice insurance, and what it might mean for the ability of malpractice liability to deliver on its risk distribution, loss prevention, and corrective justice objectives. This essay attempts to fill that gap. Part 1 provides a primer on the liability insurance underwriting cycle that draws on the research prompted by the mid-1980s insurance hard market. This part explains that the recent dramatic increases in predicted medical malpractice losses are a result of the insurance cycle, not dramatic changes in medical malpractice claim payments. Part 2 explores why the underwriting cycle is so severe in medical malpractice insurance. This part applies my recent Geneva Lecture analysis of liability risks to the specific problem of medical malpractice, with a fuller consideration of the dynamics of the underwriting cycle. In short, the cycle is so severe because there is a relatively long period between the time that the premiums for a medical malpractice policy are paid and the time that losses under that policy can be known with certainty, and because there is more uncertainty regarding future medical malpractice losses than many other kinds of losses. Part 3 explores whether insurance regulators should consider acting to moderate the underwriting cycle (assuming that they could do so). This part argues that there are good reasons to believe that medical malpractice insurance crises lead medical providers to improve patient safety and, therefore, that efforts to moderate the cycle could have a negative impact on patient safety. Further research is needed before we can draw firm conclusions, but leaving the insurance cycle alone would be the wiser course for now.

Keywords: insurance, medical malpractice, torts, underwriting cycle

JEL Classifications: G22, G38, K13

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: June 09, 2005 ; Last revised: March 15, 2006

Suggested Citation

Baker, Tom, Medical Malpractice and the Insurance Underwriting Cycle (November 7, 2004). Depaul Law Review, Vol. 54, May 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=616281


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Tom Baker (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
215-746-2185 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/thbaker/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,332
Downloads: 583
Download Rank: 11,433
Citations: 6

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.110 seconds.