Endangered Species Act Lessons Over 30 Years and the Legacy of the Snail Darter, a Small Fish in a Porkbarrel
Zygmunt J. B. Plater
Boston College - Law School
March 1, 2012
Environmental Law, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 289-308, 2004
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 49
Amidst the remarkable array of federal environmental laws dating from the early 1970s, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 has always been one-of-a-kind - in terms of the ethical territory it carves out in the nation's jurisprudence, the technical approaches it takes to resource regulation, and the political passions and stratagems it provokes on all sides of the nation's environmental protection public policy debates. The ESA has been controversial from the start, on its own terms and also as a pragmatic target of opportunity for antiregulatory forces seeking to use it as a wedge issue to roll back environmental protection laws generally. This article presents an overview analysis of the ESA's first major progression through the judicial system, the case of a little fish against a Tennessee Valley Authority dam, and of the Act's continuities and changes over the past thirty years. This evolutionary history chronicles the Act's remarkable role not only as a pioneering statutory foray into the interactions between biology and law, but as an unprecedented player and lightning rod in the nation's policy and political ecosystems as well.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: environmental law, Endangered Species Act, snail darter, environmental protection, Tennessee Valley Authority, citizen litigationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 9, 2004 ; Last revised: March 2, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds