Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=618382
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (20)



 


 



Should Like Cases be Treated Alike?


Andrei Marmor


University of Southern California - Gould School of Law

November 10, 2004

USC Law and Public Policy Research Paper No. 04-26

Abstract:     
Are there any good reasons to treat previous judicial decisions as legally binding in similar cases, just because they are similar, even if the underlying reasons of the previous decisions determined the result? I argue in this short essay that this is the relevant question about treating like cases alike, and I offer two possible principles that may ground an affirmative answer: the principle that justice should be seen to be done, and the principle of protected expectations. Both answers are criticized as over inclusive and only partly defensible. Finally, the essay concludes with a suggestion that there are two modes of analogical reasoning in adjudication, and that one of them may rationalize a certain type of cases in which like cases should be treated alike.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 10, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Marmor, Andrei, Should Like Cases be Treated Alike? (November 10, 2004). USC Law and Public Policy Research Paper No. 04-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=618382 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.618382

Contact Information

Andrei Marmor (Contact Author)
University of Southern California - Gould School of Law ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-821-5437 (Phone)
213-740-2551 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,147
Downloads: 358
Download Rank: 48,100
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  20

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds