Contextual Analysis of Tax Ownership
Columbia University - Law School
Boston University Law Review, April 2005
Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 263
Ownership is one of the most fundamental concepts in tax law, yet it is remarkably confused. The uncertainty inhibits tax planning, leads to inconsistent responses from the government, and produces unexpected outcomes in the courts. There has been no shortage of scholarly attention to the issue, but most of the commentary has been either exceedingly narrow or focused on far-reaching reforms. As a result, the law of tax ownership lacks conceptual foundation. This Article attempts to remedy the deficiency. It proposes a comprehensive approach to tax ownership and demonstrates that the doctrine may (and should) be significantly clarified without a dramatic overhaul of the existing substantive law. The approach rests on dividing all ownership questions into four categories depending on the context in which the questions arose. Using this analytical framework, the Article allocates various tax ownership authorities to appropriate categories and develops the underlying principles guiding the analysis for each group. Because these principles differ among the categories, the Article suggests that the existence of numerous seemingly inconsistent tax ownership decisions should be understood not as a sign of a confused doctrine, but as an appropriate result reflecting the underlying conceptual differences. By rationalizing and organizing the law of tax ownership, the Article provides a framework for resolving future tax ownership controversies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 70
Keywords: Tax ownership
JEL Classification: K34, H24, H25Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 30, 2004
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds