Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=622981
 
 

Footnotes (195)



 


 



A Constitution for Judicial Lawmaking


Adam Steinman


Seton Hall University - School of Law


University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 65, p.545, 2004

Abstract:     
When courts decide cases, the decisions make law because they become precedent that binds future courts under the doctrine of stare decisis. This article argues that some principles governing judicial lawmaking are functionally constitutional principles because they go to the validity of a particular attempt at judicial lawmaking (just as the constitutional principles governing legislative lawmaking determine the validity of lawmaking by legislatures). Because even poorly reasoned judicial decisions can still be effective lawmaking acts, it is important to distinguish between constitutional and non-constitutional principles and arguments. While a non-constitutional principle can be a basis for examining the wisdom or merits of a particular lawmaking act, only constitutional principles can assess whether the lawmaking act is valid.

Although the constitutional principles governing judicial lawmaking are not necessarily set forth in a written constitution, this article articulates a methodology for identifying the fundamental constitutional limits on judicial lawmaking. It then explains how this constitutionalist approach fits with various strands of legal theory, including formalism, realism, positivism, legal process, and critical legal studies. Finally, this article begins to examine the implicit constitution that governs judicial lawmaking in the federal system, explicating some of the key issues that define its contours and that can shape future development and critique.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Stare Decisis, Judicial Lawmaking

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2004 ; Last revised: September 14, 2010

Suggested Citation

Steinman, Adam, A Constitution for Judicial Lawmaking. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 65, p.545, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=622981

Contact Information

Adam Steinman (Contact Author)
Seton Hall University - School of Law ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,346
Downloads: 264
Download Rank: 63,218
Footnotes:  195

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds