Footnotes (195)



A Constitution for Judicial Lawmaking

Adam Steinman

University of Alabama - School of Law

University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 65, p.545, 2004

When courts decide cases, the decisions make law because they become precedent that binds future courts under the doctrine of stare decisis. This article argues that some principles governing judicial lawmaking are functionally constitutional principles because they go to the validity of a particular attempt at judicial lawmaking (just as the constitutional principles governing legislative lawmaking determine the validity of lawmaking by legislatures). Because even poorly reasoned judicial decisions can still be effective lawmaking acts, it is important to distinguish between constitutional and non-constitutional principles and arguments. While a non-constitutional principle can be a basis for examining the wisdom or merits of a particular lawmaking act, only constitutional principles can assess whether the lawmaking act is valid.

Although the constitutional principles governing judicial lawmaking are not necessarily set forth in a written constitution, this article articulates a methodology for identifying the fundamental constitutional limits on judicial lawmaking. It then explains how this constitutionalist approach fits with various strands of legal theory, including formalism, realism, positivism, legal process, and critical legal studies. Finally, this article begins to examine the implicit constitution that governs judicial lawmaking in the federal system, explicating some of the key issues that define its contours and that can shape future development and critique.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Stare Decisis, Judicial Lawmaking

JEL Classification: K40

Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2004 ; Last revised: July 19, 2014

Suggested Citation

Steinman, Adam, A Constitution for Judicial Lawmaking. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 65, p.545, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=622981

Contact Information

Adam Steinman (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,432
Downloads: 270
Download Rank: 69,137
Footnotes:  195

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds