Shareholder Suits and Outside Director Liability: The Case of Korea
Brian R. Cheffins
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Bernard S. Black
Northwestern University - School of Law; Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Stanford Law School
Journal of Korean Law, Vol. 11, pp. 325-362, 2011
Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. #
ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 47/2005
Reforms to Korean corporate and securities law carried out in the wake of the 1997-1998 East Asian financial crisis included a mandate that boards include a minimum number of outside directors and facilitation of shareholder lawsuits against board members for damages. The strategy of imposing liability risk on directors (both inside and outside) appeared to follow U.S. practice. In the U.S., outside directors of public companies are often sued but rarely face personal, or “out-of-pocket,” liability unless they engage in self-dealing. Instead, damages and legal fees are paid by the company, directors' and officers' (D&O) insurance, or both. Outside directors of public companies in Australia, Canada, Britain, France, Germany, and Japan similarly rarely face out-of-pocket liability due to shareholder lawsuits. Moreover, when events have occurred in these countries that increase the risk of out-of-pocket liability, there is a strong tendency for political or market forces to reestablish a non-zero but minimal level of risk for actions that do not involve self-dealing. Korea’s experience seems to be similar. We argue that Korea could go somewhat further to encourage litigation against outside directors of public companies, but should not open the way for “out of pocket” liability to become commonplace.
For a shorter, somewhat updated version of this article, see Black, Cheffins & Klausner, Shareholder Suits Against Korean Directors (2012), at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=913623.
For the other principal pieces of our overall project on outside director liability, see:
Black, Cheffins & Klausner, Outside Director Liability (Stanford Law Review, 2006), http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=894921
Cheffins and Black, Outside Director Liability Across Countries, (Texas Law Review 2006), http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=438321.
Additional pieces of this overall project are:
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=878135 (policy analysis)
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=382422 (a pre-Enron and WorldCom version of Outside Director Liability)
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=628223 (study of Korea)
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=682507 (summary article for a finance audience)
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=800604 (German language version of Germany-paper)
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=590913 (summary for practitioner audience)
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: corporate governance, director liability, fiduciary duty, securities law, securities class actions, law and finance, director duties
JEL Classification: G32, G34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 17, 2005 ; Last revised: December 7, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.471 seconds