|
||||
|
||||
Shareholder Suits and Outside Director Liability: The Case of KoreaBrian R. CheffinsUniversity of Cambridge - Faculty of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Bernard S. BlackNorthwestern University - School of Law; Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Michael KlausnerStanford Law School July 2011 Journal of Korean Law, Vol. 11, pp. 325-362, 2011 Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. # ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 47/2005 Abstract: Reforms to Korean corporate and securities law carried out in the wake of the 1997-1998 East Asian financial crisis included a mandate that boards include a minimum number of outside directors and facilitation of shareholder lawsuits against board members for damages. The strategy of imposing liability risk on directors (both inside and outside) appeared to follow U.S. practice. In the U.S., outside directors of public companies are often sued but rarely face personal, or “out-of-pocket,” liability unless they engage in self-dealing. Instead, damages and legal fees are paid by the company, directors' and officers' (D&O) insurance, or both. Outside directors of public companies in Australia, Canada, Britain, France, Germany, and Japan similarly rarely face out-of-pocket liability due to shareholder lawsuits. Moreover, when events have occurred in these countries that increase the risk of out-of-pocket liability, there is a strong tendency for political or market forces to reestablish a non-zero but minimal level of risk for actions that do not involve self-dealing. Korea’s experience seems to be similar. We argue that Korea could go somewhat further to encourage litigation against outside directors of public companies, but should not open the way for “out of pocket” liability to become commonplace. For a shorter, somewhat updated version of this article, see Black, Cheffins & Klausner, Shareholder Suits Against Korean Directors (2012), at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=913623. For the other principal pieces of our overall project on outside director liability, see: Black, Cheffins & Klausner, Outside Director Liability (Stanford Law Review, 2006), http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=894921 Cheffins and Black, Outside Director Liability Across Countries, (Texas Law Review 2006), http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=438321. Additional pieces of this overall project are: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=878135 (policy analysis) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=382422 (a pre-Enron and WorldCom version of Outside Director Liability) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=628223 (study of Korea) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=682507 (summary article for a finance audience) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=800584 (Germany-centered) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=800604 (German language version of Germany-paper) http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=590913 (summary for practitioner audience)
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40 Keywords: corporate governance, director liability, fiduciary duty, securities law, securities class actions, law and finance, director duties JEL Classification: G32, G34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 17, 2005 ; Last revised: December 7, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds