Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=631343
 
 

Footnotes (99)



 


 



The Steelworkers Trilogy and the Evolution of Labor Arbitration


Katherine V.W. Stone


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law


LABOR LAW STORIES, Laura Cooper, Catherine Fisk, eds,. Foundation Press, 2005

Abstract:     
This chapter describes the background of the Steelworkers' Trilogy cases, three cases that defined the nature of collective bargaining and the role of arbitration under U.S. labor law. The chapter begins with a discussion of the historical problem of enforcement of collective bargaining agreements from the early 20th century until the Trilogy cases were decided in 1960. It also discusses the history of the use of arbitration as an alternative mechanism to judicial enforcement. The author provides details about the background of the three Trilogy cases, the history of the cases in the lower courts, the legal strategy of Arthur Goldberg and David Feller, and the outcomes in the Supreme Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Steelworker's Trilogy cases, collective bargaining, labor arbitration

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 7, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Stone, Katherine V.W., The Steelworkers Trilogy and the Evolution of Labor Arbitration. LABOR LAW STORIES, Laura Cooper, Catherine Fisk, eds,. Foundation Press, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=631343

Contact Information

Katherine Van Wezel Stone (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,224
Downloads: 1,186
Download Rank: 8,919
Footnotes:  99

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds