Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=631582
 
 

References (23)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Thou Shalt Not Kill as Defeasible Heuristic: Law and Economics and the Debate Over Physician-Assisted Suicide


Daniel J. Gilman


Federal Trade Commission

2004

Oregon Law Review, Vol. 83, Forthcoming
U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2004-25

Abstract:     
Although the literature addressing medical decisions at the end of life is vast, surprisingly little of it has come from the perspective of law and economics. This article begins with a critical account of one of the very few law and economics-based discussions of physician-assisted suicide (PAS), that developed by Judge Richard Posner in his book, Aging and Old Age. Central to Judge Posner's account is a model of PAS as a sort of technological innovation. What this particular innovation is supposed to bring is a radical reduction in certain critical information costs attending end-of-life decision making. It is argued that Judge Posner's model - although innovative and instructive - is incomplete and, consequently, inadequate to the normative task of justifying a change in legal regime with regard to PAS. Certain cognitive issues are held to confound the already difficult task of securing bona fide patient consent. That prompts interesting questions about how to value inevitable errors in consent, questions examined in light of the risk management literature regarding valuation of life methodologies. It is argued that the PAS debate makes telling certain difficulties in such methodologies. It is also argued that we ought to adopt conservative standards with regard to attempts to legislate revisions in certain fundamental moral norms. Finding that Judge Posner and others have failed to meet such standards is an argument on behalf of what is, under the laws of most states, the status quo.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: risk, risk management, cost-benefit analysis, uncertainty, physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, social norms, norms6

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 9, 2004 ; Last revised: April 21, 2010

Suggested Citation

Gilman, Daniel J., Thou Shalt Not Kill as Defeasible Heuristic: Law and Economics and the Debate Over Physician-Assisted Suicide (2004). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 83, Forthcoming; U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2004-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=631582

Contact Information

Daniel J. Gilman (Contact Author)
Federal Trade Commission ( email )
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Room 403
Washington, DC 20580
United States
202-326-3136 (Phone)
202-326-3548 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,779
Downloads: 212
Download Rank: 84,122
References:  23
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds