Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



Discriminatory Versus Uniform Treasury Auctions


Kjell G. Nyborg


University of Zurich - Department of Banking and Finance; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); Swiss Finance Institute

Suresh M. Sundaresan


Columbia Business School - Finance and Economics


London Business School Institute of Finance and Accounting Working Paper 198

Abstract:     
We use when-issued transactions data to assess the US Treasury's current experiment with uniform auctions. When-issued volume is higher under uniform as compared to discriminatory auctions, suggesting a higher information release, which should reduce pre-auction uncertainty and the winner's curse. Consistent with this, mark-ups tend to be smaller under uniform auctions. Also, under uniform auctions, when-issued volatility falls after the auction and again after the outcome announcement. The pattern is the opposite for discriminatory auctions. This is further evidence that uniform auctions increase pre-auction information production and lower the short squeeze.

JEL Classification: G20

working papers series


Date posted: August 29, 1998  

Suggested Citation

Nyborg, Kjell G. and Sundaresan, Suresh M., Discriminatory Versus Uniform Treasury Auctions. London Business School Institute of Finance and Accounting Working Paper 198. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=6339

Contact Information

Kjell G. Nyborg (Contact Author)
University of Zurich - Department of Banking and Finance ( email )
Plattenstrasse 14
Zürich, 8032
Switzerland
+41 (0)44 634 2980 (Phone)
Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
77 Bastwick Street
London, EC1V 3PZ
United Kingdom
Swiss Finance Institute ( email )
c/o University of Geneve
40, Bd du Pont-d'Arve
Geneva, 1211
Switzerland

Suresh M. Sundaresan
Columbia Business School - Finance and Economics ( email )
3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-4423 (Phone)
212-316-9180 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/ssundaresan/

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 874

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds