Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=637202
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Trouble Preserving Paradise


Nicole Stelle Garnett


Notre Dame Law School


Cornell Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 158-184, 2001

Abstract:     
Election day 2000 was not a good day for proponents of suburban growth controls. The overwhelming initial support for initiatives that proposed state-wide growth management plans in Colorado and Arizona withered in the face of vigorous opposition campaigns. And, pro-planning forces in Oregon woke up on Wednesday morning to learn that voters had approved a little-noticed initiative amending the state constitution to require compensation for partial takings - that is, for any reduction in the fair market value of property resulting from government regulation - thus throwing into question the future of the State's widely touted model controlled-growth scheme.

These election results fly in the face of conventional wisdom: Public opinion polls consistently show high levels of support for curbing suburban growth, with many Americans listing the ills of suburban sprawl as the most important issue facing their communities. What's more, so-called smart growth initiatives enjoyed unprecedented success at the polls during the 1998 election cycle. Advocates were understandably disappointed with the results in Colorado and Arizona, where unprecedented growth has driven anti-sprawl sentiments to an all time high. At least on the surface, all three of these election results suggest that voters' asserted support for growth controls may be thinner than advocates had hoped - or at least that it has limits. This essay uses the November election results to explore what those limits may be: Why did voters reject growth controls in Colorado and Arizona, and limit them in Oregon, despite repeated protestations that they strongly support them? What distinguishes the so-called smart-growth policies that enjoyed continued success at the polls? And, what does the discrepancy between successful and unsuccessful policies tell us about how people may react to future efforts to control the supposedly dreaded suburban sprawl?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Smart growth, growth controls, takings, initiatives

JEL Classification: K11

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 7, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Garnett, Nicole Stelle, Trouble Preserving Paradise. Cornell Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 158-184, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=637202

Contact Information

Nicole Stelle Garnett (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States
574-631-3091 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nd.edu/faculty/facultypages/garnettn.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,989
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 217,482
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.218 seconds