Unity and Pluralism in Contract Law
Nathan B. Oman
William & Mary Law School
Michigan Law Review, Forthcoming
The contemporary philosophy of contract law must reconcile apparently incommensurable theories of contractual obligation, namely those based on moral rights and those based on economic efficiency. In his recent book, Contract Theory, Stephen Smith seeks to solve this problem by arguing that economic theories fail to explain contract law while rights-based theories adequately account for the law. His argument, however, rests on a misunderstanding of economic and legal reasoning, and results in implausible claims about the contours of contract law. Rather than dismissing one or the other of these two approaches, philosophers of contract law should look for ways of providing a principled integration of them. This paper argues that the Rawlsian notion of the priority of liberty provides one path toward such a principled integration.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: contract law, philosophy of law, Rawls, law & economicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 29, 2004
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds