|
||||
|
||||
An Empirical Test of the Asymmetric Models on Innovative Activity: Who Invests more into R&D, the Incumbent or the Challenger?Dirk CzarnitzkiCentre for European Economic Research (ZEW); Catholic University of Leuven (KUL) Kornelius KraftUniversity of Dortmund - Department of Economics; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 153-173 Abstract: We study whether the incumbent or the (potential) entrant invests more into R&D, using data of about 3500 German firms from 1992 to 1995 that explicitly asks firms for their motives in undertaking innovative activity, making it possible to take account intended, not just completed, market entry. We find that challengers invest more into R&D to enter a new market than the incumbents, making the patent racing model by Reinganum and others seem more accurate than the auction model of Gilbert and Newbery. We estimate a tobit model with selectivity to take account of the econometric problem of double censoring.
Keywords: Innovative activity, patent races, uncertainty, incumbent versus entrant, tobit with selectivity JEL Classification: L12, O31, O32 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 12, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.281 seconds