|
||||
|
||||
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst RecommendationsAlexander LjungqvistNew York University (NYU) - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Felicia C. MarstonUniversity of Virginia - McIntire School of Commerce William J. WilhelmUniversity of Virginia - McIntire School of Commerce Journal of Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: We investigate whether analyst behavior influenced banks' likelihood of winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,625 U.S. debt and equity offerings in 1993 to 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer's investment banking relationships with potential competitors for the mandate, prior lending relationships, and the endogeneity of analyst behavior and the bank's decision to provide analyst coverage. Although analyst behavior was influenced by economic incentives, we find no evidence that aggressive analyst behavior increased their bank's probability of winning an underwriting mandate. The main determinant of the lead-bank choice is the strength of prior underwriting and lending relationships.
Keywords: Analyst behavior, Underwriting, Commercial banks, Glass-Steagall Act JEL Classification: G21, G24 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 13, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.609 seconds