|
||||
|
||||
Are the Standards Too Poor? An Empirical Analysis of the Timeliness and Predictability of Credit Rating Changes
Paul Robbe Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Department of Financial Management Ronald Mahieu Tilburg University - Center for Economic Research, Econometrics and Finance Group January 31, 2005 Abstract: In this paper we investigate the dynamics of credit rating changes by Standard & Poor's (S&P) for all 583 companies that were included in the S&P 500 index between July 1998 and June 2003. Our analysis shows that KMV Corporation, a 'new' entrant to the credit rating industry that uses a quantitatively oriented, market-based approach to credit risk measurement, provides a significantly timelier insight into companies' credit quality changes than the qualitatively oriented, accounting-based approaches used by S&P. Based on a sample of 690 rating changes reported by S&P during the sample period, we show that 75% of the S&P rating changes are significantly anticipated by KMV more than a year in advance. Furthermore, we test for the predictability of S&P's rating changes. We show that KMV's Expected Default Frequencies possess considerable predictive power to forecast future rating changes by S&P.
Keywords: Credit ratings, predictability, credit rating agencies JEL Classifications: G14, G28 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: February 02, 2005 ; Last revised: February 02, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloc 6 in 0.234 seconds.