|
||||
|
||||
When is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence from Quasi- ExperimentsGary CharnessUniversity of California, Santa Barbara - Department of Economics David I. LevineUniversity of California, Berkeley - Economic Analysis & Policy Group July 20, 2004 Abstract: When is sabotage acceptable? We use a quasi-experimental design to study the acceptability of several forms of rule-breaking at work. In addition to hypotheses from theories of fairness, we find retaliation is perceived as more acceptable if it is an act of omission instead of an act commission and if it is in the same "domain" as the employer's bad act. Pilfering goods and services is more acceptable than taking money, while damaging property is least acceptable. Respondents who are older, female, politically conservative, and managers typically show less tolerance for acts of sabotage, while union members are union members a bit more accepting than average.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 Keywords: Perceived fairness, Sabotage, Retaliation, Omission, Commission, Domains of reciprocity, Labor relations JEL Classification: A13, B49, J28, J39, J50 working papers seriesDate posted: January 15, 2005 ; Last revised: June 14, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds