Abstract

 
 

References (29)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



When is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence from Quasi- Experiments


Gary Charness


University of California, Santa Barbara - Department of Economics

David I. Levine


University of California, Berkeley - Economic Analysis & Policy Group

July 20, 2004


Abstract:     
When is sabotage acceptable? We use a quasi-experimental design to study the acceptability of several forms of rule-breaking at work. In addition to hypotheses from theories of fairness, we find retaliation is perceived as more acceptable if it is an act of omission instead of an act commission and if it is in the same "domain" as the employer's bad act. Pilfering goods and services is more acceptable than taking money, while damaging property is least acceptable. Respondents who are older, female, politically conservative, and managers typically show less tolerance for acts of sabotage, while union members are union members a bit more accepting than average.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Perceived fairness, Sabotage, Retaliation, Omission, Commission, Domains of reciprocity, Labor relations

JEL Classification: A13, B49, J28, J39, J50

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 15, 2005 ; Last revised: June 14, 2010

Suggested Citation

Charness, Gary and Levine, David I. Ian, When is Employee Retaliation Acceptable at Work? Evidence from Quasi- Experiments (July 20, 2004). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=648730 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.648730

Contact Information

Gary Charness
University of California, Santa Barbara - Department of Economics ( email )
2127 North Hall
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
United States
805-893-2412 (Phone)
805-893-8830 (Fax)
David Ian Levine (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - Economic Analysis & Policy Group ( email )
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
510-642-1697 (Phone)
510-643-1420 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,447
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 125,202
References:  29
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds