Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=649083
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (58)



 


 



The Rat Race as an Information Forcing Device


Scott Baker


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

Stephen J. Choi


New York University School of Law

G. Mitu Gulati


Duke University - School of Law

May 25, 2005

NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 04-034; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-01; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 649083

Abstract:     
In many job settings, there will be some promotion criteria that are less amenable to measurement than others. Often, what is difficult to measure is more important. For example, possessing "good judgment" under pressure may be a better predictor of success as a law firm partner than the ability to bill a vast amount of hours. The first puzzle that this essay explores is why, in some promotion settings, organizations appear to focus on less important, but measurable, criteria such as hours billed. The answer lies in the relationship between the objectively measurable criteria, on the one hand, and the subjective and less visible (but more important) attributes on the other hand. Under certain circumstances, a competition over the measurable criteria, such as hours billed or number of deals accomplished, can force the revelation of information on hard-to-measure subjective attributes of the candidate such as judgment or collegiality. For example, it is easier to evaluate the judgment of an associate who has amassed a number of deals than one who has not. Some information about the associate's good and bad judgment is likely to be generated from the deals. So, while it makes little sense to promote associates based solely on billable hours, making billable hours the goal of the first round of a tournament, where the winners are awarded eligibility for consideration for partnership, can generate information more relevant to the second round partner selection decision.

Explaining the first puzzle leads to a second puzzle. If promotion tournaments over measurable criteria can be effectively utilized in the private sector to force information about candidate traits, why do we not see revelation tournaments elsewhere, where competition may generate information useful in evaluating candidates for promotion? The answer, we suggest, has to do at least in part with agency problems. Promotion tournaments based on measurable criteria limit the discretion of agents making the promotion decisions. When decision-makers have less discretion, the return to currying favor with those decision-makers falls. As a result, decision-makers with less discretion earn less "rent." Decision-makers acting as agents also enjoy a reduced ability to make promotion decisions according to their own preferences separate from the goals of their principals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Information forcing, law firms, tenure, judicial tournaments, US news, rankings, promotion

JEL Classification: D23, D82, J44

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 20, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Baker, Scott and Choi, Stephen J. and Gulati, G. Mitu, The Rat Race as an Information Forcing Device (May 25, 2005). NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 04-034; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-01; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 649083. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=649083 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.649083

Contact Information

Scott A. Baker
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Stephen J. Choi (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Gaurang Mitu Gulati
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,751
Downloads: 387
Download Rank: 40,272
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  58

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds