Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (34)



 


 



Why Religion in Politics Does Not Violate La Conception Americaine De La Laicite


Michael J. Perry


Emory University School of Law; University of San Diego - School of Law and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies

January 2005

Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 05-1

Abstract:     
La conception Americaine de la laicite consists principally of a constitutional norm - the nonestablishment norm - and of the law that the U.S. Supreme Court has developed in the course of enforcing the norm. The nonestablishment norm forbids government - both the national government and state government - to "establish" religion. American laicite also consists of what we may call "the morality of liberal democracy". My aim in this essay is to explain why religion in politics does not violate American laicite; more specifically, my aim is to explain why political reliance on religiously grounded morality violates neither the nonestablishment norm nor the morality of liberal democracy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Perry, Michael J., Why Religion in Politics Does Not Violate La Conception Americaine De La Laicite (January 2005). Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 05-1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=649362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.649362

Contact Information

Michael John Perry (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-712-2086 (Phone)
University of San Diego - School of Law and Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,009
Downloads: 192
Download Rank: 77,898
Footnotes:  34

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.296 seconds