Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=650243
 
 

Citations



 


 



How Traditional and Minority Religions Fare in the Courts: Empirical Evidence from Religious Liberty Cases


Gregory C. Sisk


University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)


University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 1021, 2005
U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-16

Abstract:     
When the call of religious conscience and the demand of public expectations meet at the crossroad of the public square, the enduring myth is that members of minority religious groups face a decidedly uphill battle in securing accommodation for or even tolerance of unconventional religious practices, expression, or values from the courts. By contrast, so the conventional wisdom has it, traditional Christian believers may anticipate a more hospitable welcome from the judiciary when asserting claims of conscience or religious liberty. Based upon a recent empirical study of religious liberty decisions in the federal courts, the proposition that minority religions experience a significantly lower success rate was found to be without empirical support, at least in the modern era and in the lower federal courts. Just as importantly, the myth that members of outsider faiths fail at a disproportionate rate proves to be only half of the story. In fact, counter to the popular narrative, adherents to traditionalist Christian faiths, notably Roman Catholics and Baptists, proved to be the ones who enter the courthouse doors at a distinct disadvantage.

The thesis of this essay is as follows: when compared with other religious claimants, when examined within the particular venue of the federal courts, when evaluated in the context of other potentially influential variables, and when evaluated through data drawn from recent litigation controversies, the hypothesis that minority religious adherents are more likely to lose and that the Christian faithful are more likely to win religious liberty claims is of doubtful continuing validity. Accordingly, as the new century unfolds, the more interesting inquiry may be why those whose religious practices and values fit most comfortably within the mainstream Christian tradition find themselves with a higher hill to climb than people of unconventional beliefs when seeking judicial exemption from secular regulation or judicial recognition of expression and equality rights. Is our nation's concept of religious liberty sufficient robust to encompass those whose claims of conscience may directly challenge the cherished orthodoxies of modern secular liberalism?

Keywords: Courts, judges, religion, first amendment, empirical

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: November 1, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Sisk, Gregory C., How Traditional and Minority Religions Fare in the Courts: Empirical Evidence from Religious Liberty Cases. University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 1021, 2005; U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=650243

Contact Information

Gregory C. Sisk (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States
651-962-4892 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 731

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.296 seconds