|
||||
|
||||
Relative Benchmark Rating and Persistence Analysis: Evidence from Italian Equity FundsMarco LazzarinFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Venice Loriana PelizzonCa Foscari University of Venice - Department of Economics Domenico SartoreCa Foscari University of Venice - Department of Economics Roberto CasarinUniversity of Brescia - Department of Economics; University of Venice - GRETA Ass.; Université Paris Dauphine - CEREMADE European Journal of Finance, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 297-308 Abstract: The recent introduction into the Italian mutual fund market of Morningstar performance rating of private institutions gives rise to the question of what is the relation between this relative benchmark measure and the other traditional performance measures. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the relative benchmark performance measure (Morningstar rating) applied to Italian equity funds. It is found that this performance measure is highly correlated with the classical performance measures (Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio and Treynor ratio) and poorly correlated with the customized benchmark measure (Information ratio). Furthermore, performing a persistence analysis, using non-parametric methods Cross-product Ratio and Chi-squared test, it is observed that only the Morningstar rating measure generates a strong degree of persistence. These results deviate from most European studies, which argue that Italian mutual funds display weak persistence.
Keywords: Mutual funds, performance evaluation, persistence analysis, style analysis, morningstar rating, risk adjusted measures JEL Classification: G23, G12, G14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 21, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds