Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=652743
 
 

References (17)



 
 

Citations (7)



 


 



File-Sharing, Sampling, and Music Distribution


Martin Peitz


University of Mannheim - Department of Economics

Patrick Waelbroeck


Telecom ParisTech

December 2004

International University in Germany Working Paper No. 26/2004

Abstract:     
The use of file-sharing technologies, so-called Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks, to copy music files has become common since the arrival of Napster. P2P networks may actually improve the matching between products and buyers - we call this the matching effect. For a label the downside of P2P networks is that consumers receive a copy which, although it is an imperfect substitute to the original, may reduce their willingness-to-pay for the original - we call this the competition effect. We show that the matching effect may dominate so that a label's profits are higher with P2P networks than without. Furthermore, we show that the existence of P2P networks may alter the standard business model: sampling may replace costly marketing and promotion. This may allow labels to increase profits in spite of lower revenues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: File-sharing, P2P, sampling, information transmission, piracy, music

JEL Classification: L11, L82

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 24, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Peitz, Martin and Waelbroeck, Patrick, File-Sharing, Sampling, and Music Distribution (December 2004). International University in Germany Working Paper No. 26/2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=652743 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.652743

Contact Information

Martin Peitz (Contact Author)
University of Mannheim - Department of Economics ( email )
D-68131 Mannheim
Germany
+49 621 181-1835 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://peitz.vwl.uni-mannheim.de/
Patrick Waelbroeck
Telecom ParisTech ( email )
46 rue Barrault
F-75634 Paris, Cedex 13
France
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 13,439
Downloads: 2,277
Download Rank: 2,775
References:  17
Citations:  7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.750 seconds