Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=654281
 
 

References (55)



 
 

Citations (41)



 


 



Do Analyst Conflicts Matter? Evidence from Stock Recommendations


Anup Agrawal


University of Alabama - Culverhouse College of Commerce & Business Administration

Mark A. Chen


Georgia State University - Department of Finance

July 2007

Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS 06-38
EFA 2005 Moscow Meetings Paper
AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper

Abstract:     
We examine whether conflicts of interest with investment banking and brokerage induce sell-side analysts to issue optimistic stock recommendations and, if so, whether investors are misled by such biases. Using quantitative measures of potential conflicts constructed from revenue breakdowns of analyst employers, we find that the level of analysts' stock recommendations is indeed positively related to the magnitude of the conflicts they face. The optimistic bias stemming from investment banking conflict was especially pronounced during the late-1990s stock market bubble. However, evidence from the response of stock prices and trading volumes to upgrades and downgrades suggests that the market recognizes analyst conflicts and properly discounts analyst opinions. This pattern persists even during the bubble period, contrary to popular belief that investors threw caution to the wind during the bubble. Moreover, the one-year performance of revised recommendations is unrelated to the magnitude of conflicts. Overall, our findings do not support the view that conflicted analysts are able to systematically mislead investors with optimistic stock recommendations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Stock analysts, security analysts, analyst conflicts, corporate governance, stock recommendations, wall street research, brokerage research, conflicts of interest

JEL Classification: G14, G24, G28, G29, G34, G38, K22, M41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 31, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Agrawal, Anup and Chen, Mark A., Do Analyst Conflicts Matter? Evidence from Stock Recommendations (July 2007). Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS 06-38; EFA 2005 Moscow Meetings Paper; AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=654281 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.654281

Contact Information

Anup Agrawal (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - Culverhouse College of Commerce & Business Administration ( email )
Culverhouse College of Business
EFLS, Box 870224
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0223
United States
205-348-8970 (Phone)
205-348-0590 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://old.cba.ua.edu/personnel/AnupAgrawal.html
Mark Chen
Georgia State University - Department of Finance ( email )
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,047
Downloads: 772
Download Rank: 16,894
References:  55
Citations:  41

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds