Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=657521
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (302)



 


 



The Limits of Lawyering: Legal Opinions in Structured Finance


Steven L. Schwarcz


Duke University - School of Law

March 3, 2005


Abstract:     
Significant controversy surrounds the issuance of legal opinions in structured finance transactions, particularly where accountants separately use these opinions, beyond their traditional primary use, for determining whether to characterize the transactions as debt. Reflecting at its core the unresolved boundaries between public and private in financial transactions, this controversy raises important issues of first impression: To what extent, for example, should lawyers be able to issue legal opinions that create negative externalities? Furthermore, what should differentiate the roles of lawyers and accountants in disclosing information to investors? Resolution of these issues not only helps to demystify the mystique, and untangle the morass, of legal-opinion giving but also affects the very viability of the securitization industry, which dominates American, and increasingly global, financing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 31, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Steven L., The Limits of Lawyering: Legal Opinions in Structured Finance (March 3, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=657521 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.657521

Contact Information

Steven L. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7060 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,531
Downloads: 457
Download Rank: 12,539
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  302

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds