|
||||
|
||||
Renegotiation-Proof Contracting, Disclosure, and Incentives for Efficient InvestmentNina BaranchukUniversity of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management Jun YangIndiana University Philip H. DybvigWashington University in Saint Louis - John M. Olin Business School June 13, 2007 AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Abstract: Disclosure by firms would seem to reduce the informational asymmetry that is a cause of investment inefficiency in firms. However, the effect of disclosure is subtle, especially when the link between disclosure and firm value is endogenous and depends on incentives within the firm. We analyze various disclosure regimes and determine which ones are effective in a model with optimal renegotiation-proof contracts. Disclosing only accepted contracts is not effective, but either full transparency of all compensation negotiations or, more reasonably, additional disclosure of a forward-looking announcement is effective. The model is robust to renegotiation in equilibrium and is also robust to changing who offers any renegotiation. The analysis illuminates optimal disclosure regulation. For example, it tells us that allowing forward-looking disclosure is beneficial provided we are in an environment that produces the optimal contract, which gives the manager an incentive for truth-telling.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: Investment efficiency, compensation disclosure, earnings forecasts, optimal contracting, renegotiation-proofness JEL Classification: G38, M41, M52 working papers seriesDate posted: February 3, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.594 seconds