Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=661182
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



The Criminal-Civil Distinction and the Utility of Desert


Paul H. Robinson


University of Pennsylvania Law School


Boston University Law Review, Vol. 76, pp. 201-214, 1996

Abstract:     
The communist Chinese have distinct criminal and civil systems, as do the democratic Swiss, and the monarchist Saudis.1 The criminal-civil distinction also is a basic organizing device for Islamic Pakistan, Catholic Ireland, Hindu India, and the atheistic former Soviet Union, industrialized Germany, rural Papua New Guinea, the tribal Bedouins, wealthy Singapore, impoverished Somalia, developing Thailand, newly organized Ukraine, and the ancient Romans. Apparently every society sufficiently developed to have a formal legal system usesthe criminal-civil distinction as an organizing principle. Why? Why has every society felt it necessary to create a system to impose criminal liability distinct from civil liability?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: civil liability, criminal liability, desert, punishment theory

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 4, 2005 ; Last revised: December 4, 2007

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Paul H., The Criminal-Civil Distinction and the Utility of Desert. Boston University Law Review, Vol. 76, pp. 201-214, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=661182

Contact Information

Paul H. Robinson (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,869
Downloads: 270
Download Rank: 64,425
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.203 seconds