Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=667441
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (43)



 


 



Shattering the Neutral Surrogate Myth in End-of-Life Decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and Her Family


Lois L. Shepherd


University of Virginia Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities; University of Virginia School of Law


Cumberland Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In the Terri Schiavo case, different family members who want the legal authority to make decisions for Terri Schiavo have sought different treatment options - with results as opposed as life and death. Had the case not come before the courts, Michael Schiavo, Terri's husband, would have had Terri's feeding tube removed long ago; Terri's parents, Mary and Robert Schindler, if either had been named surrogate in Michael's stead, would continue feeding her indefinitely. Recognizing, as the Schiavo case highlights, that who among family members speaks for the patient can determine the course of treatment or non-treatment for a patient, it is necessary to turn renewed attention to the question of why families, whether we define them as spouses or parents, are involved in the end-of-life decisionmaking of their relatives. Are they merely a representative or even fiduciary of the patient or are they stakeholders in their own right? Do we look to family members as surrogates because they ensure a sounder process, a neutral process, for determining patient preferences and interests, or do we look to family members as surrogates because we recognize that families want to be (and perhaps should be?) involved? This paper argues that some deference to family members' own interests can be justified on the grounds of a broad notion of patient self-determination, but some degree of deference might also be justified out of respect for family members' own interests. Our law should not demand strict neutrality of these family members, but should acknowledge that their interests may have value as well. At the same time, there must be limits: the family's preferences and interests should not be allowed to overshadow those of the patient.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: End-of-life, Schiavo, surrogate, family, persistent vegetative state, life-sustaining treatment, incompetent patient, treatment withdrawal, mediation, artificial nutrition and hydration, Pinette, proxy, feeding tube, permanently unconscious, self-determination, neutrality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 16, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Shepherd, Lois L., Shattering the Neutral Surrogate Myth in End-of-Life Decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and Her Family. Cumberland Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=667441

Contact Information

Lois L. Shepherd (Contact Author)
University of Virginia Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities ( email )
Box 800758
Charlottesville, VA 22901
United States
434-982-3970 (Phone)
University of Virginia School of Law
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,773
Downloads: 361
Download Rank: 45,231
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  43

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.203 seconds