Organizational Process Models of Budgeting
Oregon State University - College of Business
Willamette University - Atkinson Graduate School of Management
December 1, 2002
There are several reasons for the obscurity of the organizational process model. Perhaps the most important is the widespread acceptance of the standard economic model, which holds that spending outcomes are determined by the supply of and the demand for publicly provided goods and services and that competition somehow constrains elected officials to serve the tastes and preferences of the median voter. The best way to define the organizational process model is to follow its interesting etiology across time and academic boundaries, focusing on the work of Herbert Simon, Aaron Wildavsky. John Padgett, John Patrick Crecine, and P.D. Larkey. We divide the development of the organizational process model into four distinct phases: pronouncement, formalization, differentiation, and diffusion, look in turn at each of these phases, and conclude that the time has come for scholars to revisit the model, exploring its potential for contributing not only to formal budget theory but also to other fields of public policy and management as well.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Budget, satisficing, organizational process, mechanisms
JEL Classification: B25, H61working papers series
Date posted: February 22, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.454 seconds