|
||||
|
||||
Standing Upright: The Moral and Legal Standing of Humans and Other Apes
Adam J. Kolber University of San Diego School of Law; Brooklyn Law School Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 163, 2001 Abstract: The law typically treats great apes and other non-humans as property and not as persons. This is so, even though great apes have cognitive abilities that exceed those of some mentally-deficient humans. Nevertheless, these humans are entitled to the full range of personhood rights, while apes are entitled to none of them. Without attempting to resolve this discrepancy, I suggest more modestly that those rights we do extend to apes under the Animal Welfare Act might be more easily safeguarded if we were to extend legal standing to apes, allowing suit to be brought on their behalf by human guardians. Doing so would not require us to view apes as persons but would provide increased protections for these surprisingly intelligent creatures.
Keywords: Animal Rights, Standing, Apes, Peter Singer, Sentience Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 14, 2005 ; Last revised: January 25, 2006Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.235 seconds.