Constitutional False Positives and the Populist Moment
Gerard N. Magliocca
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
Notre Dame Law Review 81, no. 3 (2006): 821-888
This Article examines how the failure of a broad and robust movement for constitutional change can displace the law in the opposite direction. The possibility of this legal false positive is a crucial missing link that explains why doctrine shifted so dramatically in the 1890s during the Populist Party's doomed attempt to achieve power. With its sharp attack on established principles and impressive popular support, the Populists triggered equally strong resistance from conservatives in the White House and the Supreme Court. That resistance was so intense that it warped the fabric of the law on issues including the role of the Commerce Clause, the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the incorporation of the Bill of Rights against the States. With this background, many of the great landmarks from this era and the modern interpretive assumptions drawn from them appear in a new light.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 68
Date posted: March 2, 2005 ; Last revised: May 6, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.296 seconds